Thursday, July 03, 2014
Political Mayhem Thursday: Mitt Romney for Drug Czar!
That's exactly what I am proposing in today's Detroit News. And yes, I'm serious. The paper's version was abridged for space (that happens); here is the complete version:
        In a series of public appearances, 
Detroit native Mitt Romney has planted the idea that he might run for 
president again in 2016.  He should resist the idea; that day has 
passed.  Instead, his experience and passion should be applied
 to public service in a different way:  The Mitt Romney who founded Bain
 Capital and saved the Utah Winter Olympics should be the next Drug 
Czar, and use his financial acumen to destroy narcotics businesses 
without mass incarceration.
         In the run-up to the 2012 presidential 
election, Mitt Romney was celebrated (by Republicans) and eviscerated 
(by Democrats) for his vocation:  building up and tearing down 
businesses.  Regardless of how one views the social utility
 of this enterprise, no one can dispute that Romney is a smart, 
passionate, well-educated man who loves public service and was very good
 at what he did while working for Bain Capital.
         Romney’s availability matches up with a 
special moment for narcotics policy.  There is a broad right-left 
consensus that the stale tactics of the War on Drugs failed miserably.  
It wasted billions of dollars in taxpayer money while
 failing to limit drug use.  Meanwhile, millions of Americans went to 
prison, and a disproportionate number of them were black thanks to harsh
 new laws focused on crack cocaine.  Federalism was trampled as Big 
Government took over state functions to ineffectively
 battle street crime.  There was something to offend everyone. 
         The shape of our future (and Romney’s) may
 be embedded in our own history.  In the 1980’s, crack was one of two 
public health crises that ran side-by-side along parallel tracks.  The 
other, of course, was AIDS.  At first, both
 were seen as problems caused by the moral failings of disfavored 
minorities:  the media and others linked the rise of AIDS to the 
promiscuity of some gay men, and crack was blamed on African-Americans’ 
supposed affinity for that drug.  Both of these conclusions
 were, in some measure, wrong, but these perceptions drove corresponding
 moral crusades.  Then, in 1986, the paths diverged.  A respected 
Republican and Reagan appointee, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, shamed
 the nation into addressing AIDS as a medical problem
 rather than a moral scourge.  The key line in his epic report on AIDS 
argued that “It is time to put self-defeating attitudes aside and 
recognize that we are fighting a disease, not people.” 
         Since illegal narcotics is a business 
within a market, a modern C. Everett Koop addressing that task should be
 a businessperson.  Fittingly, Romney’s work at Bain Capital focused on 
the part of the narcotics business we have not
 systemically attacked—cash flow.  Primarily, we have fought narcotics 
by attacking labor (through arrest and incarceration), profits (through 
forfeitures of drug dealers’ homes and cars), and product (through drug 
seizures).  These are precisely the factors
 Romney discounted at Bain, where he cared much more about evaluating a 
company’s cash flow in analyzing its suitability as a target.  After 
all, profit, labor, and product can all be replaced so long as there is 
cash flow, and it was cash flow that promised
 Bain the possibility of debt being paid off over time.  But if cash 
flow and credit are cut off (and drug networks don’t have access to 
traditional credit), the business will fail.  If given a chance to 
de-construct narcotics businesses Romney’s purpose would
 be different, but his focus the same:  Take the money, because that is 
what matters. 
         Finally, Romney-as-Drug Czar would not be 
deterred by the complexity of international financial networks as he set
 out to disrupt the cash flow systems of narcotics businesses.  This is a
 man who lives within those very networks,
 after all.  In the 2012 campaign, he was harshly criticized for the 
complexity of his own finances, which involved wholly owned corporations
 in Bermuda, no fewer than 12 different funds in the Cayman Islands, 
secretive Swiss bank accounts, and other devices
 which required his 2010 tax return to include 55 pages just to describe
 the transactions with foreign entities in that one year. While a 
comprehensive understanding of such complex cash flows may have hurt 
Romney in the last campaign, they would be a striking
 asset if set to the task of curtailing the flow of drug money back to 
wholesalers and suppliers.  This is not a guy who is scared of tangled 
financial puzzles.
         We have never had a C. Everett Koop for 
narcotics, but it’s not too late to fix that mistake.  We can no longer 
afford to fill our prisons, exacerbate racial tensions, and congratulate
 ourselves when no progress is made.  With
 the War on Drugs being dismantled, we effectively have a do-over on 
policy and tactics.   The new ideas should come from and be implemented 
by people like Romney—people who know business the way that Koop knew 
medicine.  After all, the harshest criticism of
 Romney’s work at Bain Capital was that he sometimes ruthlessly 
dismantled and bankrupted businesses.  Isn’t that exactly what we want 
someone to do to the organizations which import cocaine, trade in 
methmphetamine, and wholesale death in the form of heroin?  





