Tuesday, August 16, 2011

 

It's crazy time again in college football!


As you might remember, last year there was a great deal of angst in Waco over the seemingly imminent break-up of the Big 12 Conference, a debacle which would have left Baylor relegated to a lesser conference of schools like the Conference USA or (worse) the Sun Belt. Fortunately for Baylor, disaster was averted as the Big 12 lost only Colorado (to the Pac-10) and Nebraska (to the Big 10). One result of these moves was that the Big 12 now has 10 members and the Big 10 has... 12. Really. And, for the record, the Pac-10 now has 12 as well.

The resulting status did not remain settled for long, though, as last week it appeared that Texas A & M was set to bolt the Big 12 for the SEC. However, for the time being at least, it appears that the SEC has not actually invited A & M to become a member (a development which inspired some epic fail threads).

Sadly, the Big 10 did not accept my plan for their re-alignment by division.

The rumor is (and has been) that all this movement will eventually lead to four 16-member "super conferences." I think this might be true, and if it is, it means that some leagues and teams are going to be out of the mix.

Right now, there are 6 big conferences with automatic BCS bids (listed here in terms of strength according to commentators other than me): The SEC, the Big 10, the Pac-10, the Big 12, the ACC, and the Big East. It appears that the SEC, Big 10 and Pac-10 have positioned themselves to most easily become three of those four resulting super-conferences. Which raises the question... who would be the fourth surviving conference?

Here are some possibilities:

1) The Big 12 could survive by adding some strong new members. This is not without challenges, though, because it would leave the entire East Coast out of the loop. (It's also not clear who those "strong new members" would be-- after BYU, the list gets pretty thin).

2) The ACC and Big East could combine to form a super-conference. This would leave the Big 12 out in the cold, along with the current members of those leagues who would be jettisoned (good-bye Rutgers! You are bad at sports involving men!).

3) A new conference could be formed between the current members of the ACC/Big East/Big 12. Problematically, this would involve a very odd geographic footprint.

Under any of these scenarios but the first, Baylor would be out of luck. As President Ken Starr has wisely concluded, a strong Big 12 is Baylor's best shot at staying in the big time. Good luck, bears!

Comments:
Did you just mock Rutgers football?
 
On Wisconsin!
 
Mark, albeit the shake-up in college football is causing great angst across the land for the likes of Baylor and many such institutions … let me remind you as a guy that used to lace them up in Michigan … you are living back in the northern Mid-West and with residence in Minnesota (where they sell out the state high school hockey tournament, as they do in MA) … the upheaval this past spring and summer in the world of college hockey affiliations is of far greater concern and should get it’s appropriate coverage. First things first, Mark.
 
Craig-- very true! I'm on it.
 
Thanks Mark! Back to your senses. Just want to be sure the football-centric world view of your Texas years does not blind you to the importance of college ice hockey, with its well documented huge national following.
 
That following being me, you, a handful of people in Boston and Wisconsin, and the entire state of North Dakota (which adds another 45 people).
 
Exactly my point! Although given the legal wrangling over their mascot, North Dakota may not make the official count … which may leave us with a handful of drunk hockey fans in sports bars in Madison, St. Paul, and East Lansing, Ithaca, Hamilton NY, and South Boston. Nevertheless, back to all the drama in college hockey and teams jumping from conference to conference, and new conferences being born amidst all the tumult (who can focus on college football with all this going on?):

http://www.uscho.com/realignment/

http://www.uscho.com/from-the-press-box/2011/07/19/another-view-thinking-of-history-and-the-conference-realignment/
 
As a devoted Spartan, I take deep offense to the doctored photo appearing in today's Razor. Sparty would never be directly involved with any riotous behavior. His most recent Twitter entry of "Burn Tottenham! Burn!" has been taken out of context.
Perhaps Osler is just jealous that a favorite team of his seems unable to field a worthy human-sized mascot.
http://michigantoday.umich.edu/story.php?id=8003
 
Division I AA.

It worked for William & Mary and it could work for Baylor. And Rutgers, etc.
 
... and this is why IPLawGuy will never, ever, be the President of Baylor.
 
Carrie Willard, you are truly a wise woman.

ON WISCONSIN!
 
Ruh-roh. The Woody/Willard alliance is indeed dangerous.
 
That, and:
-I'm not a Baptist
-I would worship the Aqua Bhudda if asked.
-I'm not an academic
-I would miss cold weather too much.

I do, however, have a few snappy green and gold ties.
 
Wait-- is the Aqua Buddha an Episcopal thing? I should have known...
 
HELLO!, Isn't the NAW House of God next to a Big body of running water? And isn't he constantly watching the water for signs! You think he's really just looking for kayakers and canoe-ists?
 
Ohhhh... you are totally right. Wow.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

#