Thursday, July 22, 2010

 

Political Mayhem Thursday: The Fictional Ronald Reagan


As I have explained before here, I have had to eat some crow regarding Ronald Reagan. When he was president (and I was pretty young), I really was not a fan. I thought he wasn't very smart, that he provoked war, and that his ideas were wrong. Looking back, much of my view was wrong. He was smart, and his letters reveal that. He avoided war successfully, in a way his Republican successors did not. Finally, I came to embrace the view he seemed to hold most dear, which is that a small federal government is best.

That said, I am baffled by the cult of Reagan that has cropped up. It seems that modern Republicans think he was flatly anti-spending, anti-immigrant, that he always cut taxes, and that he never did anything with Democrats. All of this is wrong. Reagan accomplished some great things, but each one he did by violating at least one of those maxims. In short, Reagan was deeply pragmatic, and this was one key to his success. He actually accomplished things through legislation, something few modern Republicans can claim (unless belittling Democrats or less-conservative Republicans counts as an accomplishment).

Let's explore the reality and myth:

Myth: Reagan always cut taxes.
Truth: Ronald Reagan did initiate the biggest tax cut in history, and we are probably all better off for that. However, he also signed the biggest tax INCREASE in history (in 1982), and it was necessary at the time to avoid creating deficits. He also raised taxes significantly in 1983 (a gas tax and payroll tax) and 1984 (by cutting deductions).

Myth: Reagan was against big-government spending.
Truth: Ronald Reagan's biggest accomplishment in many minds was the decline of the Soviet Union as a threat to our security. However, he used one primary tool to do this: big-government spending. He spent so much on the military that the Soviets overextended themselves. It worked, it may have been brilliant, but it was nothing less than spending huge amounts of tax dollars to accomplish a goal.

Myth: Reagan created a smaller federal government and restrained debt.
Truth: President Reagan pledged to eliminate two federal cabinet positions (with the associated bureaucracies), but instead added one (for Veterans Affairs). The national debt tripled in his terms, and the US went from being the the world's largest creditor to the biggest debtor.

Myth: Reagan was aggressive in the use of force abroad.
Truth: While President Reagan TALKED a lot about being willing to use force, he did not actually do it. There were no real wars under his watch, despite the increase in arms. Most notably, when the U.S. embassy and then a Marine barracks in Beirut were bombed by terrorists, he did not react at all-- in fact, he pulled out of that area, acknowledging that retribution would not be worth the cost in civilian life.

Myth: Reagan was tough on illegal immigrants.
Truth: In fact, Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants in 1986. Amnesty. Go figure.

Ronald Reagan, sadly, is becoming an icon that does not represent the admirable and pragmatic man he was. Heck, the people who idolize him now would view parts of his record (huge spending increases, amnesty for illegal immigrants, adding cabinet positions, pulling out when we are attacked) as the worst kind of liberalism.

The more I learn, the more I admire Ronald Reagan. It saddens me that he did not live out his belief in smaller government, but I do see a worthwhile pragmatism in what he did. However, the Reagan who actually existed does not seem to be the person held up by the contemporary right, and that is doubly sad, because there is probably more to admire in the truth about Reagan than there is in the myth. The truth is full and human and complex and redemptive, if we choose to see it clearly.

Comments:
Ha! Had a great time tonight with IPLawGuy, Waco Farmer, RRL, Woody, Brennan, and others.
Which might explain the dearth of comments.
 
It is tempting in the current political climate to paint one's opponents (and their heroes) in broad strokes. Reagan becomes the archetype of the conservative hero to his fans, and the evil, nefarious mastermind to his detractors. FDR gets the same treatment, but the roles are reversed.

The truth is that probably very few people in government are amoral. Most presidents, I believe, sincerely act out of a desire to do right by the country. We, as the political spectators, simply believe (perhaps in truth, perhaps in arrogance) that we know best.

I try to temper my criticisms of politicians with the fact that I operate on an information-limited judgment as to their actions.

I don't believe Reagan was a bad man; I think he was a good man that I happen to disagree with. I think he did some spectacularly bad things (Iran-Contra), and while this impacts my view of him in a seriously negative way... he was trying his hardest, and in a job where even trying your hardest is never enough. Reagan was, like every president before him, and every president to come after, a complex figure whose legacy in history will largely be left to the ideological portraits painted by our historians. Whatever sense we might have had of the man himself is gone with him.

That said, of course the man does not live up to his legend, whether viewed as a hero or a villain. No one ever does. But Reagan-as-symbol, whether positive or negative, is in a way far more powerful than Reagan-as-fact. That is the way of our mythmaking.
 
and we had a great time with all of you (i'm certain i speak for RRL here.).
i love the insights into reagan, who i consider the greatest president of my lifetime, but would rather revel in the glory that was a plain old good time tonight than engage in political discussion.
for those who have not had the opportunity to make their acquaintances, IPLawguy and Waco Farmer are solid folks.
I've known RRL long enough to know that he's a good enough guy to look past his glaring faults. (tongue firmly in cheek.)
also, mark, i think your career path suggestion for RRL is spot on. let's see if we can get him there.
either that, or we're going to push him for Waco mayor on the most hilarious, yet palatable, platform ever. and he will win.
woody, over and out.
 
and we had a great time with all of you (i'm certain i speak for RRL here.).
i love the insights into reagan, who i consider the greatest president of my lifetime, but would rather revel in the glory that was a plain old good time tonight than engage in political discussion.
for those who have not had the opportunity to make their acquaintances, IPLawguy and Waco Farmer are solid folks.
I've known RRL long enough to know that he's a good enough guy to look past his glaring faults. (tongue firmly in cheek.)
also, mark, i think your career path suggestion for RRL is spot on. let's see if we can get him there.
either that, or we're going to push him for Waco mayor on the most hilarious, yet palatable, platform ever. and he will win.
woody, over and out.
 
What I wouldn't have given to see Professor Osler at Scruff's.
 
politicians are crooked and amoral. more to come manana.
hugs.
 
@William King 2:24
osler was well-mannered and under control. simultaneously, he was the centerpiece of the celebration.
God save William and Mary's homecoming celebrations....
 
But was he Reaganesque? I am sure Reagan would never go to Scruffy's.
 
Mr. Scruffy, tear down this bar!
 
Oops, sorry Mr. Scruffy-- it looks like someone already did.
 
I will tolerate the musings of the liberal hoards. I can take it when Ronald Reagan is attacked by Osler in a smear campaign. Personal insults, fine. I will even listen to IPLawguy insult "Southern Cross", Stephen Stills, and my musical taste for days on end.

But, I will not, under any circumstances, at any time, stand by and watch the good name of Scruffy Murphy's besmirched. Scruffy Murphy's is as American as apple pie and baseball. It is all that is good and right in the world.

Oh sure, you can put on your Abercrombie and Fitch outfit and head on over to Austin's. Or you can put on your best birkenstocks and wrap a dish towell around your head and call it a bandana and head over to the Dancing Bear. Or you could head over to Cricket's and spend a night trying to convince everyone around you that you, not them, know the most about some obscure undrinkable beer from Poland.

I will be at Scruffy's, where Ronald Reagan's dream of freedom, capitalism, tax cuts, and astrology still reigns supreme.
 
Ronald Reagan would definitely have appreciated the $2 drafts at Scruffy's
 
So, Professor, I'm young—and probably (definitely) have yet discover some of my own faults. That said, the portion of this post which intrigued me most was the section where you describe your transformational view of President Reagan over time. I’m curious, what was it about your life experience that changed your mind?
 
I don't know about you guys, but I'll have some of whatever RRL's serving. That defense of Scruffy's, the bar I look over out of my window every night, is right on point. RRL's Scruffy Murphy's Manifesto FTW.
 
I will not take advantage of my opponent, Mr. Scruffy's, lack of maturity and experience.

Mr. Scruffy, I paid for that microphone!

Mr. Scruffy, Tear down this wall.

Okay, I'm done.

Well, Mr. Scruffy.
 
Apparently Scruff's is the shining watering hole on the hill. Who knew?
 
CTL--

What changed was that I started thinking for myself. Both liberals and conservatives were wrong about Reagan-- the liberals were wrong in condemning much of what he said about the proper role of government, while conservatives were wrong to think he always acted in what is thought of as a "conservative way."

Also, many years ago, IPLawGuy suggested I read Reagan's letters, which revealed him to be very intelligent, warm, and a strategic thinker.

Finally, I worked for five years for the federal government.
 
If you want to see someone who would not even get a second look these days in the neo-Republican-Tea-whatever Party, it would be Dwight D. Eisenhower. He actually warned America...

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. "

He saw what was coming some 55 years ago.

As for Reagan..."If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's probably a duck." You can't preach about smaller government being the ideal and then actually increasing government and having the national debt triple while in office. Ideas are nice and all, but a public servant has to live by one's actions and not just words.

History may remember Clinton most not for budget surpluses or even good ol' Monica, but for allowing our manufacturing base to spiral downward with bad trade agreements. Reagan/Bush (père)/Clinton/Bush (fils) will all be judged for allowing outsourcing of manufacturing jobs when we are all dead and buried, although they would all say that they support American manufacturers. Words do not equal results.

I believe the myth of Reagan is far more valuable to Republicans than his actions...although I wish that party would invoke more Abraham Lincoln than Ronald Reagan.

Robert Best
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

#