Monday, February 18, 2008

 

The Penry Saga finally comes to a conclusion


The long death-penalty saga of John Paul Penry has finally come to a close. As Doug Berman compellingly describes it the prosecutors avoided a fourth retrial (on sentencing) by agreeing to life without parole, after appeals of the prior botched trials cost upwards of one billion dollars in total.

Penry's case is a long and circuitous one, and played a major role in defining Texas' death penalty procedures. At the core of the case was Penry's mental retardation, which repeatedly resulted in new trials with the same result. One of Penry's appeals was heard last year right here in Room 127 at Baylor Law School, and I remember feeling caught in a time warp as the attorneys discussed the events of the crime, which occurred in 1979.

Now Penry will spend the rest of his life where he has spent the last 28 years-- in prison. Was it worth the cost? Many of us are beginning to suspect that the death penalty will not be salvaged, even in Texas, in the face of intractable costs and declining enthusiasm for the sanction.

Comments:
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" AND wastes a lot of money.
 
The Baylor Law Review just published a detailed article describing the appeal process of one mentally retarded criminal defendant. It discusses the effect of the Penry appeals had on other defendants. I recommend it.


Love,
Matt
 
An eye for an eye may make evil think twice
 
When I worked with the Texas Wesleyan Law School Innocence Project we went ot the Records building in Fort Worth to search for prosecutorial admission of Penry's mental status during the early stages of trial. There were boxes and boxes of trial transcripts to look through. I thought it was interesting when I got to law school how much that case has impacted death penalty law.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

#