Wednesday, March 28, 2007
A Leak of U.S. News....
It looks like the results of the U.S. News law school rankings have leaked, and they have Baylor Law at 53. This is almost no change from last year's position at 51, which is encouraging given that new reporting methodology was used this year. Swanburg ran a poll, in which the majority of voters thought that Baylor Law's position will improve this year, but this seemed unrealistic given the change in reporting numbers for incoming students.
For a good analysis of how these rankings are compiled, check this out. A major component of the rankings is the "academic reputation" of a school, which is compiled through surveying certain law professors-- the dean, chair of the hiring committee, most recently tenured prof., and, uh, one other person I can't remember. Anyways, as the most recently tenured professor at Baylor, I got to fill out the survey this year. It was an odd experience; knowing how much this matters to a law school these days, I answered "No Opinion" for many schools, since I didn't have enough information. However, I found that I had to resist voting just based on an isolated fact or single person at those schools. The experience left me with the impression that many people must vote based on hunches, rumors or stray events, and that would risk skewing the results of poll.
Like many academics, i wish that the U.S. News rankings were not seen as so important. For one thing, these rankings are somewhat arbitrary, and for another, they slight the strengths of a school like Baylor, where (for example) our Practice Court program doesn't strengthen us in any of the recorded categories.
You can see the biggest movers up and down (including Pepperdine moving up 21 places!) here. Just to reiterate, I think this a pretty good result for Baylor given the change in reporting.
Comments:
<< Home
As previously noted in an earlier post, the two most ridiculous things about the U.S. News College and grad school rankings is the endowment/financial resources factor and the student teacher ratio factor. Yes, having a lot of money gives a school certain advantages, but does that mean one gets a good education? Or a good JOB upon graduation.
And the Prof/pupil ratio thing is absurd when one considers that many high profile Professors teach only occasional seminars and spend most of their time writing and researching.
BTW, my Mom is the Deputy Sr. News Editor there at U.S. News and her college always does quite well in the rankings....
And the Prof/pupil ratio thing is absurd when one considers that many high profile Professors teach only occasional seminars and spend most of their time writing and researching.
BTW, my Mom is the Deputy Sr. News Editor there at U.S. News and her college always does quite well in the rankings....
Big moves are nothing new to Pepperdine. In the last five years I think the ranks have been something like: Third Tier, 99, 77, 87, and 66 respectively.
I was disappointed that this was not an article on the high fidelity audio equipment manufactured by H.J. Leak and Co. Ltd of London. LEAK was most well know for their "LEAK sandwich" which was an innovative loud speaker design. Unfortunately, the company has been defunct for several years and I was hopeful that you were announcing its renaissance.
I feel like I need to send you tons of random pictures for your blog so you dont feel the need to repeat pictures, or maybe you like repeating pictures because it adds to your "character."
Squeeky--
Oh, yes, send pictures! I would like that. As long as they don't all involve a dog looking cute.
The picture here is Eric Porterfield in a Mardi Gras mask. I think it deserves to be posted quite frequently. In this case, it served as a metaphor for the masked reviewers who get to anonymously review law schools for the rankings.
Post a Comment
Oh, yes, send pictures! I would like that. As long as they don't all involve a dog looking cute.
The picture here is Eric Porterfield in a Mardi Gras mask. I think it deserves to be posted quite frequently. In this case, it served as a metaphor for the masked reviewers who get to anonymously review law schools for the rankings.
<< Home